A Daily Network publication
Explore the network
Digital Capital Daily
Independent Intelligence on Institutional Digital Assets
Wednesday, September 23, 2026The Morning Brief →Sign in
The Wrap

FTX's estate routed $75 million of ether to a market maker

The transfer to Wintermute is best read as estate mechanics, and the next distribution will show whether the trust keeps routing ether through market makers.

Wallets that onchain analysts tie to the FTX bankruptcy estate and Alameda Research sent ether to a Wintermute address early Wednesday, in a transfer whose size depends on how you count. PeckShieldAlert flagged 23,639 ether, worth roughly $65 million, moving from an address labeled to the estate and Alameda to a wallet labeled Wintermute, while EmberCN counted six wallets and 27,372 ether combined, and CoinDesk puts the total at about $75 million: a gap that reads as scope rather than disagreement, since PeckShield appears to have caught the largest single transaction and EmberCN the full set.

What the onchain record does not establish is a sale, because a transfer to a market maker or over-the-counter platform can indicate that a holder intends to sell or hedge a large position without sending it to an exchange, but it fits inventory, hedging, or a sale worked out over time just as well. The destination's identity rests on a public block-explorer label, and the analysts' counts settle quantity, not intent. Wintermute did not immediately respond to CoinDesk's request for confirmation, and the FTX Recovery Trust has not made public statements about the transfers.

The route is not new: estate- and Alameda-labeled wallets have moved digital assets to exchanges before, across a wind-down that has run for years, and this transfer lands while the trust works through its creditor-distribution program, which in March planned a $2.2 billion payout, the fourth under the Chapter 11 plan.

Reading the transfer as estate mechanics rather than a view on ether starts with the creditor-distribution program, because a trustee liquidating a multi-billion-dollar book has one lever that matters: execution. Size sold through an intermediary is priced away from the visible market, and what creditors recover is the sum of those prices rather than the print on any single session. Sending $75 million to a market maker instead of an exchange is the professional version of a choice the trust faces every time it converts crypto to cash for a distribution.

Watch where the next tranche lands. The ether ETFs shed $400 million over three sessions this month, but that measures a wrapper, and an estate raising cash for creditors has no obligation to use one, or any public venue, to get it done.

If later distributions keep routing ether through market makers, the trust is treating its remaining crypto as supply to be worked rather than a headline to be managed, and the visible portion of FTX's liquidation is likely to stay smaller than the real one. Creditors get paid out of distributions, not wallet labels, which is why the estate's largest transfers will keep appearing in onchain alerts after the fact.

Sources & further reading
CoinDesk — Policy & Institutions
More from Digital Capital Daily
The Wrap

One clip size is more than half of Kalshi's ether tape

Repeated dollar-denominated clips mean the print shows how orders arrive, not how many hands are there to receive them; the venue's real asset is its CFTC perimeter, and the tape does not need to prove anything.
The Wrap

Kalshi's ether perp tape is a policy artifact

A single repeating trade size in Kalshi's own API shows what happens when a venue's incentive budget, not organic demand, writes the volume print.
ETPs & Funds

Ondo filed twice at zero; the money went to a manager

Four digital-asset wrappers filed empty in the same week the only funded digital-asset vehicle in the record raised $102.4 million.
Elsewhere in the networkAll titles →
Every weekday · 6:30 a.m. ET

The Morning Brief

The private wealth industry in four minutes, every weekday at 6:30 a.m. ET. Free.