RedStone report puts tokenized equity supply up 395% while onchain collateral sits at $81 million
Leveraged equity exposure onchain sits almost entirely in perpetual futures rather than tokenized shares, The Defiant notes.
Tokenized equity supply reached $3.17 billion, up 395% over the past year, while lending collateral against those tokens sat at roughly $81 million, according to a RedStone report covered by The Defiant. That collateral is about 2.6% of supply, the arithmetic behind The Defiant's framing that DeFi use stayed under 3%.
If supply growth of that size says demand for tokenized exposure is being served, the collateral figure says something narrower about what holders do with the tokens afterward, and the answer, so far, is not much borrowing. RedStone's second data point cuts the same way. Leveraged equity exposure onchain sits almost entirely in perpetual futures rather than in the tokenized shares themselves. The likeliest reading, an inference rather than a disclosed fact, is that traders who want leverage on equities are getting it through derivatives that settle in cash while the tokenized share stays a hold-and-custody instrument.
The leverage skips the tokens
That distinction matters to anyone reading tokenization as market structure rather than distribution. A perpetual future does not need the share to be tokenized at all, so the venue capturing leveraged equity flow onchain is the derivatives market, not the tokenization rail, and the $81 million suggests the same about borrowing. If the pattern holds, growth in tokenized-equity supply is building a channel that settles onchain more than it is building an onchain credit market.
As this publication has argued, institutional crypto exposure has so far run through wrappers engineered for professional allocators, with listing standards, quoting rules and platform approvals acting as the visible gatekeepers. The tokenized-equity version of that arc has issuers and chains in place of gatekeepers, and on RedStone's numbers supply is running well ahead of the credit plumbing that would make the tokens financeable.
What the coverage does not say is which issuers, chains or venues account for the $3.17 billion, how the $81 million in lending collateral was measured, or whether the 395% refers to token count, dollar supply, or both; RedStone's report is the sole source for all of it. If borrowing against tokenized equity starts compounding anywhere near the pace of issuance, these instruments will have crossed from holdings into balance-sheet inventory, and nothing in the report suggests that is happening yet.
Save this analysis and keep the funds you follow together in My Desk.
Sign in to save articles or follow funds.